mass damage
or similar/redundant damage

Your law firm represents numerous clients who have been harmed in a similar way by companies. There is an enormous amount of correspondence with the defendant companies, insurance companies and clients. Every reply letter has to be read with great effort before the next step can be taken. Although the answers can be divided into certain categories, the problem is that similar issues are formulated very differently, which makes it impossible to automate processes.

And this is exactly what we have developed our AI semantha® for: It understands text by its meaning, regardless of the choice of words – this is how you find the content you are looking for, no matter how it is formulated. semantha® understands text by its meaning, regardless of the choice of words – this is how you find the content you are looking for, no matter how it is formulated.

It can compare documents with each other, comparing similar subject areas and checking for semantic similarities and differences. It also shows which topics were not found in the other document.

client file

The creation of a brief is preceded by the compilation and structuring of countless documents for the client file. Finding crucial sections that are relevant to the creation of the pleading takes a lot of time. Given the large number of documents, even the search for the right document is very time-consuming. Once this has been found, you know which passage is being searched for, but you do not know the exact choice of words, which results in additional work and a lot of searching and reading.

Our AI semantha® understands text by its meaning, regardless of the choice of words – this is how you find the content you are looking for, no matter how it is formulated.

With semantha®, all documents are read and, regardless of the choice of words, understood and stored according to their meaning. When searching for a context, it not only indicates in which document the context can be found, but also the correct place within the document.

Reply to the court

You respond to numerous lawsuits in your law firm and repeatedly come across similar presentations by the plaintiffs. Often, excerpts from past responses can be used as the basis for the new pleading. However, the search for similar passages from the past is very time-consuming due to ever varying wording and large quantities of documents with a lot of text. Even self-constructed files, in which pleadings and suitable replies are created as templates, become unmanageable in the course of time.

With semantha® new claims can be searched automatically for passages that you have already successfully processed in the past. It understands text by its meaning, regardless of the choice of words – so you will find the content you are looking for, no matter how it is formulated.

replica

The statement of claim brought by you is followed by the defendant’s statement of defence. The two documents must be compared, comparing how the other party has commented on each point. The statement of defence is usually not in the same chronological order as the lawsuit – so the pure search for passages describing an event is very time-consuming. In addition, it is necessary to find topics which have not been replied to or which have been added as a completely new aspect.

semantha® understands text by its meaning, regardless of the choice of words – this is how you find the content you are looking for, no matter how it is formulated.